2012/12/21 Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 19:32 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Let's imagine you have 4 CPUs. We keep the CPU 0 to offline RCU callbacks 
>> there and to
>> handle the timekeeping. We set the rest as full dynticks. So you need the 
>> following kernel
>> parameters:
>>
>>       rcu_nocbs=1-3 full_nohz=1-3
>>
>> (Note rcu_nocbs value must always be the same as full_nohz).
>
> Why? You can't have: rcu_nocbs=1-4 full_nohz=1-3

That should be allowed.

>   or: rcu_nocbs=1-3 full_nohz=1-4 ?

But that not.

You need to have: rcu_nocbs & full_nohz == full_nohz. This is because
the tick is not there to maintain the local RCU callbacks anymore. So
this must be offloaded to the rcu_nocb threads.

I just have a doubt with rcu_nocb. Do we still need the tick to
complete the grace period for local rcu callbacks? I need to discuss
that with Paul.

>
> That needs to be fixed. Either with a warning, and/or to force the two
> to be the same. That is, if they specify:
>
>   rcu_nocbs=1-3 full_nohz=1-4
>
> Then set rcu_nocbs=1-4 with a warning about it. Or simply set
>  full_nohz=1-3.

Yep, will do.

Thanks!

>
> -- Steve
>
>>
>> Now if you want proper isolation you need to:
>>
>> * Migrate your processes adequately
>> * Migrate your irqs to CPU 0
>> * Migrate the RCU nocb threads to CPU 0. Example with the above 
>> configuration:
>>
>>       for p in $(ps -o pid= -C rcuo1,rcuo2,rcuo3)
>>       do
>>               taskset -cp 0 $p
>>       done
>>
>> Then run what you want on the full dynticks CPUs. For best results, run 1 
>> task
>> per CPU, mostly in userspace and mostly CPU bound (otherwise more IO = more 
>> kernel
>> mode execution = more chances to get IPIs, tick restarted, workqueues, 
>> kthreads, etc...)
>>
>> This page contains a good reminder for those interested in CPU isolation: 
>> https://github.com/gby/linux/wiki
>>
>> But keep in mind that my tree is not yet ready for serious production.
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to