Hello, Dmitry. On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:54:50AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > This is not 100% equivalent transformation as now we schedule first and > disable IRQ later... Anyway, I think the driver shoudl be converted to > threaded IRQ instead. Mark, does the patch below make any sense to you?
Yeah, I think the conversion is actually broken. There isn't anything which prevents work item execution racing against irq disabling. I agree the right thing to do is using threaded irq handler. Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
