On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:12:29PM +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote: > -#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) > +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) || defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) > /* > * return_address uses walk_stackframe to do it's work. If both > * CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y and CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND=y walk_stackframe uses unwind > - * information. For this to work in the function tracer many functions would > - * have to be marked with __notrace. So for now just depend on > - * !CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND.
So what have you done about the issue referred in this comment? Or do you believe that fixing warnings (even if they are explicit #warning statements) is far more important than code being functionally correct? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
