Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> David Konerding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But the attitude that "many eyes make all bugs shallow" and "let the
> > users test the code for us" just don't hold up. For the former,
> > clearly, many eyes didn't find a lot of basically obvious bugs, for the
> > latter, it's just impolite.
>
> You mentioned the CHECKER case as proof for your point that "many eyes
> make all bugs shallow" does not work. One might argue the other way
> around: The CHECKER people actually found the bugs, so it works.
No, the CHECKER people themselves didn't find any bugs. They wrote a clever
analyzer
that finds error patterns (actually, just patterns) and submitted them. Some
false positives, but worse,
an uncountable number of false negatives and as-yet-unknown error patterns.
That's not "a lot of eyes", it's a few brains and a fast computer. I'm not
saying that's a *bad* thing but I certainly don't think it's an example of
"lots of eyes".
>
>
> Regards
> Joerg
>
> =====
> --
> Regards
> Joerg
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
