On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Andriy Skulysh wrote:
> There is a race in enqueueing thread to a pool and
> waking up a thread.
> lockd doesn't wake up on reception of lock granted callback
> if svc_wake_up() is called before lockd's thread is added
> to a pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andriy Skulysh <andriy_skul...@xyratex.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |    1 +
>  net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c      |    9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> index 676ddf5..1f0216b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct svc_pool {
>       unsigned int            sp_nrthreads;   /* # of threads in pool */
>       struct list_head        sp_all_threads; /* all server threads */
>       struct svc_pool_stats   sp_stats;       /* statistics on pool operation 
> */
> +     int                     sp_task_pending;/* has pending task */
>  } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> 
>  /*
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index b8e47fa..c7ab6f5 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,8 @@ void svc_wake_up(struct svc_serv *serv)
>                       rqstp->rq_xprt = NULL;
>                        */
>                       wake_up(&rqstp->rq_wait);
> -             }
> +             } else
> +                     pool->sp_task_pending = 1;
>               spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
>       }
>  }
> @@ -634,7 +635,13 @@ struct svc_xprt *svc_get_next_xprt(struct
> svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
>                * long for cache updates.
>                */
>               rqstp->rq_chandle.thread_wait = 1*HZ;
> +             pool->sp_task_pending = 0;
>       } else {
> +             if (pool->sp_task_pending) {
> +                     pool->sp_task_pending = 0;
> +                     spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
> +                     return -EAGAIN;

That should be ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN).

Other than this this looks right to me....

Out of curiosity: how did you run across this problem, and how did you
test the fix?

--b.

> +             }
>               /* No data pending. Go to sleep */
>               svc_thread_enqueue(pool, rqstp);
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to