From: Yanchuan Nian <ycn...@gmail.com>

The layout will be set unusable if LAYOUTGET fails. Is it reasonable to
increase the refcount iff LAYOUTGET fails the first time?

Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycn...@gmail.com>
---
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index e7165d9..d00260b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void
 pnfs_layout_set_fail_bit(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, int fail_bit)
 {
        lo->plh_retry_timestamp = jiffies;
-       if (test_and_set_bit(fail_bit, &lo->plh_flags))
+       if (!test_and_set_bit(fail_bit, &lo->plh_flags))
                atomic_inc(&lo->plh_refcount);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to