On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 06:16:35PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
> 
> devm_request_threaded_irq requests and irq that is freed when a driver
> detaches.  This patch uses devm_request_threaded_irq for irqs that are
> requested in the probe function of a platform device and are only freed in
> the remove function.
> 
> Additionally, the original code used devm_kzalloc, but kfree.  This would
> lead to a double free.  The problem was found using the following semantic
> match (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression x,e;
> @@
> x = devm_kzalloc(...)
> ... when != x = e
> ?-kfree(x,...);
> // </smpl>
> 
> The error handling code in the probe function is also simplified in the
> cases where there is now nothing to do other than return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
> 
> ---
[....]
> @@ -994,9 +989,6 @@ static int pm860x_battery_remove(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       struct pm860x_battery_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
>       power_supply_unregister(&info->battery);
> -     free_irq(info->irq_batt, info);
> -     free_irq(info->irq_cc, info);
> -     kfree(info);

It is not safe to access battery ('struct power_supply') object after
_unregister() (and irq handlers will surely do). Instead of removing
free_irq(), the right fix would be to place the two calls before
_unregister().

Thanks,
Anton

>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>       return 0;
>  }
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to