rq->skip_clock_update shouldn't be negative. Thus the check
in put_prev_task() is useless.
It was probably intended to do the following check:
if (prev->on_rq && !rq->skip_clock_update)
We only want to update the clock if the current task is
not voluntarily sleeping: otherwise deactivate_task()
already did the rq clock update in schedule(). But we want
to ignore that update if a ttwu did it for us, in which case
rq->skip_clock_update is 1.
But update_rq_clock() already takes care of that so we
can just remove the broken condition.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 15ba35e..8dfc461 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2886,7 +2886,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct
*prev)
static void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
- if (prev->on_rq || rq->skip_clock_update < 0)
+ if (prev->on_rq)
update_rq_clock(rq);
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
}
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
