On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 02:40 +0000, ANNIE LI wrote: > > @@ -1080,18 +1081,18 @@ static void gnttab_request_version(void) > > panic("we need grant tables version 2, but only version 1 is > > available"); > > } else { > > grant_table_version = 1; > > + grefs_per_grant_frame = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct > > grant_entry_v1); > > gnttab_interface =&gnttab_v1_ops; > > } > > - printk(KERN_INFO "Grant tables using version %d layout.\n", > > - grant_table_version); > > } > > > > Is it better to keep printk here? In your last patch, you removed it > because gnttab_request_version and gnttab_resume are all called in > gnttab_init. and gnttab_resume also contains calling of > gnttab_request_version. But in this patch, gnttab_setup is used, and > does not have this issue now.
Yes, I think we want to print this at both start of day and resume? Either by adding a print to gnttab_resume() or by keeping the existing one here in preference to moving it to gnttab_setup(). I'd prefer the latter to avoid the duplication, unless I'm mistaken and request_version is called in more than those two locations. Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/