3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "niko...@redhat.com" <niko...@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit e196c0e579902f42cf72414461fb034e5a1ffbf7 ]
Race between bonding_store_slaves_active() and slave manipulation
functions. The bond_for_each_slave use in bonding_store_slaves_active()
is not protected by any synchronization mechanism.
NULL pointer dereference is easy to reach.
Fixed by acquiring the bond->lock for the slave walk.
v2: Make description text < 75 columns
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fu...@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_slaves_acti
goto out;
}
+ read_lock(&bond->lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
if (!bond_is_active_slave(slave)) {
if (new_value)
@@ -1586,6 +1587,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_slaves_acti
slave->inactive = 1;
}
}
+ read_unlock(&bond->lock);
out:
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
