At the moment, we check owner when we enable queue in tun. This seems redundant and will break some valid uses where fd is passed around: I think TUNSETOWNER is there to prevent others from attaching to a persistent device not owned by them. Here the fd is already attached, enabling/disabling queue is more like read/write.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> --- Note: this is unrelated to Stefan's bugfix. diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index fbd106e..78e3225 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c @@ -1789,10 +1792,8 @@ static int tun_set_queue(struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr) tun = tfile->detached; if (!tun) ret = -EINVAL; - else if (tun_not_capable(tun)) - ret = -EPERM; else ret = tun_attach(tun, file); } else if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_DETACH_QUEUE) { tun = rcu_dereference_protected(tfile->tun, lockdep_rtnl_is_held()); -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/