Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, thats definitely the problem, sorry for that. > > > [PATCH] tcp: accept RST without ACK flag > > commit c3ae62af8e755 (tcp: should drop incoming frames without ACK flag > set) added a regression on the handling of RST messages. > > RST should be allowed to come even without ACK bit set. We validate > the RST by checking the exact sequence, as requested by RFC 793 and > 5961 3.2, in tcp_validate_incoming() > > Reported-by: Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
All good here, thanks for the quick turnaround! Tested-by: Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> (I originally thought the FIFOs were part of the problem, so I left that in my test case) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/