On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 18:49 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:30:58PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Merged patch is obviously broken: huge_pmd_set_accessed() can be called
> > only if the pmd is under splitting.
> 
> Of course I assume you meant "only if the pmd is not under splitting".
> 
> But no, setting a bitflag like the young bit or clearing or setting
> the numa bit won't screw with split_huge_page and it's safe even if
> the pmd is under splitting.
> 
> Those bits are only checked here at the last stage of
> split_huge_page_map after taking the PT lock:
> 
>       spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>       pmd = page_check_address_pmd(page, mm, address,
>                                    PAGE_CHECK_ADDRESS_PMD_SPLITTING_FLAG);
>       if (pmd) {
>               pgtable = pgtable_trans_huge_withdraw(mm);
>               pmd_populate(mm, &_pmd, pgtable);
> 
>               haddr = address;
>               for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, haddr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>                       pte_t *pte, entry;
>                       BUG_ON(PageCompound(page+i));
>                       entry = mk_pte(page + i, vma->vm_page_prot);
>                       entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
>                       if (!pmd_write(*pmd))
>                               entry = pte_wrprotect(entry);
>                       else
>                               BUG_ON(page_mapcount(page) != 1);
>                       if (!pmd_young(*pmd))
>                               entry = pte_mkold(entry);
>                       if (pmd_numa(*pmd))
>                               entry = pte_mknuma(entry);
>                       pte = pte_offset_map(&_pmd, haddr);
>                       BUG_ON(!pte_none(*pte));
>                       set_pte_at(mm, haddr, pte, entry);
>                       pte_unmap(pte);
>               }
> 
> If "young" or "numa" bitflags changed on the original *pmd for the
> previous part of split_huge_page, nothing will go wrong by the time we
> get to split_huge_page_map (the same is not true if the pfn changes!).
> 

But this time BUG_ON(mapcount != mapcount2) in function
__split_huge_page will be trigged.

> If you think this is too tricky, we could also decide to forbid
> huge_pmd_set_accessed if the pmd is in splitting state, but I don't
> think that flipping young/numa bits while in splitting state, can
> cause any problem (if done correctly with PT lock + pmd_same).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majord...@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to