On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:54:15PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
> 
> commit 87ed50036b866db2ec2ba16b2a7aec4a2b0b7c39 upstream.
> 
> If the rpc_task exits while holding the socket write lock before it has
> allocated an rpc slot, then the usual mechanism for releasing the write
> lock in xprt_release() is defeated.
> 
> The problem occurs if the call to xprt_lock_write() initially fails, so
> that the rpc_task is put on the xprt->sending wait queue. If the task
> exits after being assigned the lock by __xprt_lock_write_func, but
> before it has retried the call to xprt_lock_and_alloc_slot(), then
> it calls xprt_release() while holding the write lock, but will
> immediately exit due to the test for task->tk_rqstp != NULL.
> 
> Reported-by: Chris Perl <chris.p...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

This is marked only for kernel versions 3.1 and later, which looks
correct as it seems to address a problem starting with commit
43cedbf0e8dfb9c5610eb7985d5f21263e313802

-- 
[]'s
Herton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to