On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:36:17 -0500
Nickolai Zeldovich <nicko...@csail.mit.edu> wrote:

> srcip_matches() previously had code like this:
> 
>   srcip_matches(..., struct sockaddr *rhs) {
>     /* ... */
>     struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &rhs;
>     return ipv6_addr_equal(..., &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
>   }
> 
> which interpreted the values on the stack after the 'rhs' pointer as an
> ipv6 address.  The correct thing to do is to use 'rhs', not '&rhs'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nicko...@csail.mit.edu>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 17c3643..12b3da3 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ srcip_matches(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr 
> *rhs)
>       }
>       case AF_INET6: {
>               struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)srcaddr;
> -             struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rhs;
> +             struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)rhs;
>               return ipv6_addr_equal(&saddr6->sin6_addr, &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
>       }
>       default:

Nice catch...

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to