On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:09 PM, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 01/17/2013 04:48 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:46:21PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: >>> >>> Here is the second revision at implementing compat_ioctl support for >>> Android's alarm-dev driver in staging. >>> >>> The first patch removes the pre-Android 1.0 _OLD ioctls, per Colin's >>> suggestion. Then the second patch does some refactoring to cleanup >>> and separate the copying of user data from the logic, and the final >>> patch adds the compat_ioctl support. >>> >>> I've tested this with a trivial unit test compiled for both 32bit >>> and 64bit on a x86_64 kernel, and it looks ok, but closer review >>> would be appreciated to make sure I didn't break anything. >>> >>> Additional feedback or thoughts would be welcome! >> >> These look fine to me, want me to apply them to my -next tree for 3.9? > > > Yea, sure. I was going to resend tomorrow without the RFC tag. > > Colin, Arve: No objections? >
Looks OK to me, but have not tested them. -- Arve Hjønnevåg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
