Please don't start another "SCST Vs. LIO" holy war here. We all know why LIO belongs to Linux kernel and SCST does not.
On Friday, January 18, 2013 3:54:18 AM UTC+2, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Andreas Steinmetz, on 01/16/2013 08:19 PM wrote: > > > Thus, lio (http://www.linux-iscsi.org/) seemed to be the politically and > > > technically favoured solution. > > > > [...] > > > > > The fun part of it was that I finally ended up using SCST - which was > > > refrained from kernel inclusion for technical reasons beyond my > > > knowledge. > > > > No, it was purely political. There has never been any technical argument why > LIO > > is better. And can not be. > > > > Thanks, > > Vlad > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
