On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:47:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:02:29AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > > Update NTB version to 0.25 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > > index b792ccd..df86882 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ > > #include "ntb_regs.h" > > > > #define NTB_NAME "Intel(R) PCI-E Non-Transparent Bridge Driver" > > -#define NTB_VER "0.24" > > +#define NTB_VER "0.25" > > I'm not objecting to this, but in the end, does it really matter? Why > not just stick with whatever kernel version you are using? Keeping this > up to date is going to be hard over the long haul, right?
Currently, it is a convenient way to verify the people testing the code are running the latest version, since they are usually running their tests on a stable kernel. As the code becomes more stable, I can see this becoming unnecessary and I will remove it then. Thanks, Jon > > thanks, > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
