* Ohad Ben-Cohen <[email protected]> [130118 12:58]: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Cong Ding <[email protected]> wrote: > > The pointer obj is dereferenced in line 146 and 149 respectively, so it is > > not > > necessary to check null again in line 149 and 175. And I have checked that > > all > > the callers of these two functions guarantee the parameter obj passed is not > > null. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <[email protected]>
Yes looks like that's a pointless check and would already obj being NULL would fail earlier in those functions: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
