On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:27:54 -0800 Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote:
> (cc'ing Andrew as scheduler folks are difficult to get response from > these days and I can't think of anyone else to bother :) > > Hello, Li. > > The cgroup part looks good to me but it would be great if the > descriptions are more detailed, especially, about why the change is > beneficial or what it's aiming at. I take it that the shed changes > are necessary to facilitate the later cgroup changes? Can you please > elaborate how? > > The scheduler part of changes are mostly mechanical, so it would be > great if we can get ack from scheduler people and route these together. > The sched parts do look pretty innocuous and could be viewed as "cgroup stuff which happens to reside in kernel/sched/". If you like the code, I think the best you can do is to merge it up, make sure the sched guys are fully cc'ed then send it in to Linus. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
