On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:05:12PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote: > > What makes you say that there is a dependency here? It's really not at > > all obvious why a change to the primary IRQ signalling mechanism would > > affect the internal interrupts of the device.
> Yes, functionally this dependency should not matter.However, if > mfd/primary irq state is low and its components are high then it shall > not look good. Therefore the term dependency was used, probably I should > have written it in a different manner. This logic doesn't follow terribly directly - looking at what you've posted it in fact seems that the trigger type is irrelevant in the function drivers?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
