On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:32 AM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: >>> Again: Please explain what is bad with this solution. >>> I cannot see a better and more robust way for kdump other than >>> reserving the original reserved memory areas as declared by the BIOS. >> >> It is bad because it creates more complexity than is needed. >> >> The whole point is that what we want is simply to switch type 1 to type >> X, with the sole exceptions being the areas explicitly reserved for the >> kdump kernel. > > Do you prefer to "reserveram" way in attached patch?
Hi, Thomas, Can you please check attached reserveram version on your setup? If it is ok, i will put it in for-x86-boot patchset and send it to Peter for v3.9. Thanks Yinghai
e820_reserveram_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
