> This is a reiserfs security issue, but only of theoretical nature (Even i= > f > triggered, it won't harm you). But the reason for this bug is in NFS (v2,= If the blocks contained my old /etc/shadow I'd be a bit upset. > displacement instead of vertical displacement) is planned. > > I can tell you more if you want. I trust Chris to keep it in order. I've not yet had a broken patch from them for -ac - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the future? Harald Dunkel
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the futur... Frank Fiene
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the futur... Nicholas Petreley
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the f... Alan Cox
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this t... Xuan Baldauf
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is th... Alan Cox
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? ... Xuan Baldauf
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs old data bug ... Chris Mason
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the futur... jury gerold
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the futur... Shawn Starr
- Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the futur... Ookhoi