On 01/24/2013 06:34 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 17:26 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: >> On 01/24/2013 05:07 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:14 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: >>> >>>> Now it's time to work on v3 I think, let's see what we could get this time. >>> >>> Maybe v3 can try to not waste so much ram on affine map? >> >> Yeah, that has been a question in my mind at very beginning, but how... > > Allocate at domain build time the max we can acquire via hotplug? >>> Even better would be if it could just go away, along with relic of the >>> bad old days wake_affine(), and we make the balance path so damn light >>> but clever that select_idle_sibling() can go away too... and a pony ;-) >> >> Hmm...may be, I need some consideration here, a totally balance path, >> interesting... > > Unification is the right target, hitting it might not be so easy though. > >> But I think we still need the clean code which sbm bring to us, do we? > > Sure, if it makes things perform better.
Ok, let me think about these, big changes may not show in v3, but I will keep those in mind. Regards, Michael Wang > > -Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
