bd_openers is stable under bd_mutex, no need to check it twice.

Cc: Alexander Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <y...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/block_dev.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 82b7c9a..2f70584 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, 
fmode_t mode, int for_part)
                                }
                        }
 
-                       if (!ret && !bdev->bd_openers) {
+                       if (!ret) {
                                bd_set_size(bdev,(loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9);
                                bdi = blk_get_backing_dev_info(bdev);
                                if (bdi == NULL)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to