On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:43:59PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I will get to those once this series is sorted out. > Since there are no interdepencies between the patches, > my preference is to have them applied by the individual > subsystem maintainers. Anything that has not at > least made it into linux-next by the next merge window > and has not received a 'NAK' or been obsoleted by > another patch, I plan to submit as part of an arm-soc > branch for 3.9.
And, last night we have new warnings. My allnoconfigs no longer build cleanly because of new vexpress section mismatches in the mfd code. It seems to me that you're on a loosing battle unless you test the tree and drop code _before_ propaging it out if it adds new warnings... force the pain of these warnings down on to others so that they learn to create better code in the first place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
