* Mike Galbraith <bitbuc...@online.de> wrote: > On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 14:05 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > The performance issue observed with AIM7 is still a mystery. > > Hm. AIM7 mystery _may_ be the same crud I see on a 4 node 40 > core box. Stock scheduler knobs are too preempt happy, produce > unstable results. I twiddle them as below to stabilize > results. > > I'm testing a load balancing series from Alex Shi with AIM7 > and whatnot, added your series on top of it and retested. > What I see is improvement.
Since we want both series that's good news, agreed? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/