* Mike Galbraith <bitbuc...@online.de> wrote:

> On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 14:05 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > The performance issue observed with AIM7 is still a mystery.
> 
> Hm.  AIM7 mystery _may_ be the same crud I see on a 4 node 40 
> core box. Stock scheduler knobs are too preempt happy, produce 
> unstable results. I twiddle them as below to stabilize 
> results.
> 
> I'm testing a load balancing series from Alex Shi with AIM7 
> and whatnot, added your series on top of it and retested.  
> What I see is improvement.

Since we want both series that's good news, agreed?

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to