* H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either > >> in my inbox nor on LKML... > > > > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even > > got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than > > e.g. from Ingo's, and all of this identical to 0...2). > > > > Or see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1688991/, according > > to which you even responded to it (which is the concern Ingo was > > referring to). > > > > Ah yes, now I have the context. > > And with that, I have to NAK the patch. I did talk to the KVM > people and they confirmed that this is NOT something they > want. They do not program VT-x to VMEXIT on CR0 changes. > > So this is Xen-specific, and penalizing other hypervisors is > wrong.
Are patches #1 and #2 still OK? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/