Hi Ingo

Thanks for your correcting.
Because thinking of  most of 32bit CPU belong to low-end CPUs(smaller
cache), they should more  emphasize  i-cache miss, I chose Os for
them.
I will test it and send out result ASAP.

Regards
Ling

2013/1/27, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>:
>
> * ling.ma.prog...@gmail.com <ling.ma.prog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In this version we also append CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE for i386.
>
> Were those measurements done on i386 as well? I'd be content
> with keeping the current minimal - and mostly documentary -
> patch that only does this on 64-bit. I just wanted to record the
> current benchmark numbers mostly.
>
> Also see the discussion with Linus - this is by no far an
> unconditionally good option and we'll probably have to wait for
> more GCC action (-Ok or so) before being able to enable size
> optimizations everywhere without unacceptable trade-offs.
>
> Thanks,
>
>       Ingo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to