On 01/28/2013 05:40 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
> 
>> For each port that is in PHY mode we obtain a PHY device using the USB PHY
>> library and put it out of suspend.
>>
>> It is upto platform code to associate the PHY to the controller's
>> port and it is upto the PHY driver to manage the PHY's resources.
> 
> "up to" is two words, not one.

right :P

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c |   54 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> index fd2f5450..a35e44e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ static const char hcd_name[] = "ehci-omap";
>>  
>>  
>> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>  
>> +struct omap_hcd {
>> +    struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> 
> This pointer is not needed any more.
> 
OK.

>> +    struct usb_phy **phy;   /* one PHY for each port */
>> +    int nports;
> 
> Is there a reasonable upper limit on the number of ports?  If there is 
> you could just put a fixed-size array here.

For now there are only 3 which is defined in OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS. 

> 
>> @@ -233,6 +240,39 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>      hcd->rsrc_len = resource_size(res);
>>      hcd->regs = regs;
>>  
>> +    omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
>> +    omap->nports = pdata->nports;
>> +    i = sizeof(struct usb_phy *) * omap->nports;
>> +    omap->phy = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, i, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!omap->phy) {
>> +            dev_err(dev, "Memory allocation failed\n");
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
> 
> You have to put a "goto" here, not a "return".  The hcd must be cleaned 
> up properly.

good catch!

> 
>> @@ -295,11 +342,18 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_remove(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>  {
>>      struct device *dev                              = &pdev->dev;
>>      struct usb_hcd *hcd                             = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +    struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> 
> What's with the weird spacing in the first two declarations?  This 
> isn't a typeset document where the paragraphs need to be fully 
> justified.  :-)

Funny that it is all over the place ;). I'll fix it around whatever I touch.
> 
>> +    int i;
>>  
>>      usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
>>      disable_put_regulator(dev->platform_data);
>>      usb_put_hcd(hcd);
> 
> This line must be moved down.  When the hcd is deallocated, the
> omap_hcd structure goes with it.

Good one. Will fix.
> 
>> +    for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
>> +            if (omap->phy[i])
>> +                    usb_phy_shutdown(omap->phy[i]);
>> +    }
>> +
> 

regards,
-roger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to