On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
> > deficiencies:
> >
> > * Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT
> > (e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..)
> > * Not multi-platform-image-build friendly (choice .. endchoice constructs)
> > * cpu variants support (750/770) is exclusive.
> >
> > The first 2 have been fixed in subsequent patches.
> > Due to the nature of the 750 and 770, it is not possible to build for
> > both together, w/o special runtime glue code which would hurt
> > performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
Looks good - all former comments addressed, and nothing were jumping
into my eyes now.
Many existing architectures looks worse from the build stuff perspective...
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
