Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:45:56PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:26:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > >> <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > Em Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > >> >> My patches are always relative to: > >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip.tip.git
> >> >> Do you still need to rebase against your tree? > >> > Well, userspace code normally is developed on my tree and eventually > >> > goes to the one you mentioned. If you make sure that now, that both are > >> > synched after some weeks, then probably it'll work with my tree. > >> How's the kernel proper side of your tree sync'd with tip.git? I cannot > >> have > >> the kernel patches for one tree and the perf patches for another. That's a > >> lot of overhead especially when it comes to testing. > > Normally regularly, right now it seems all is synched. > Ok, will resubmit the series against your tree then. Also everytime Ingo merges I rebase my tree against tip/perf/core, if you ever need something that is in some other branch that everybody agrees will go upstream, like tip/perf/urgent or Linus's, just let me know and I'll coordinate with Ingo and merge it into acme/perf/core. Talking about that I need to merge tip/perf/urgent, Jiri needs that precise attribute revert... - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
