Hi Antoniou, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Vaibhav, > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:14:30, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> Hi Vaibhav, > >> > >> On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 16:38:50, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >>> [...] > >>>> > >>>> TBH I haven't found a simple way to print out the silicon revision > >>>> number. > >>>> Anyone on the list know a quick and dirty method? > >>>> > >>> > >>> You can dump the DEVICE_ID register @ 0x44e10600. > >>> Bits 31:28 should be 0 for PG1.0 and 1 for PG2.0. > >>> > >> > >> Thanks this works perfectly: > >> > >> original-bone: > >> root@beaglebone:~# devmem2 0x44e10600 w > >> Read at address 0x44E10600 (0xb6ff4600): 0x0B94402E > >> > >> bone-black: > >> root@beaglebone:~# devmem2 0x44e10600 w > >> Read at address 0x44E10600 (0xb6fcc600): 0x1B94402E > >> > > > > I just re-read the mail-chain and I am confused here. > > So the patch in question is meant for Bone-A4 which has > > PG1.0? > > > > It is a general bug fix. The problem was discovered only on > the bone black which has PG2.0 silicon. The driver has been > tested and it works on the original bone with PG1.0 as well. >
But Mugunthan mentioned that he doesn't see this on an EVM with PG2.0 silicon... is there any board dependency here? Regards, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
