Hi Kukjin,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c between commits f69254328793 ("ARM: dts: Fix
compatible value of pinctrl module on EXYNOS5440") and b533c8685b16
("ARM: dts: fix compatible value for exynos pinctrl") from the arm-soc
tree and commit bda7f6d4e198 ("gpio: samsung: skip gpiolib registration
if pinctrl support is enabled for exynos5250") from the samsung tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index b2016ed,0d46db6..0000000
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@@ -3023,9 -3023,9 +3022,10 @@@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(
        */
        struct device_node *pctrl_np;
        static const struct of_device_id exynos_pinctrl_ids[] = {
 -              { .compatible = "samsung,pinctrl-exynos4210", },
 -              { .compatible = "samsung,pinctrl-exynos4x12", },
 -              { .compatible = "samsung,pinctrl-exynos5250", },
 +              { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl", },
 +              { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4x12-pinctrl", },
++              { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pinctrl", },
 +              { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pinctrl", },
        };
        for_each_matching_node(pctrl_np, exynos_pinctrl_ids)
                if (pctrl_np && of_device_is_available(pctrl_np))

Attachment: pgpHIbygCTjky.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to