From: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Currently in the empty abx500_pin_config_get() function, we're returning -EINVAL, with a comment stating that the reason for the failure is that the function isn't implemented yet. Well there's a proper return code for that. If we use it, we can do away with the comment too, as it would be implied.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c index 539c9bb..305a9cb 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c @@ -971,8 +971,7 @@ int abx500_pin_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin, unsigned long *config) { - /* Not implemented */ - return -EINVAL; + return -ENOSYS; } int abx500_pin_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, -- 1.7.11.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
