On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:11:28AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:10:31AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Yeah, that should be easily convertable to the new interface. How > > should we route these changes? Your patch can go through the usual > > nfs channel and the conversion and deprecation patches can be held off > > until after -rc1. Does that sound okay? > > Ooh, BTW, the cyclic allocation is broken. It's prone to -ENOSPC > after the first wraparound. There are several cyclic users in the > kernel and I think it probably would be best to implement cyclic > support in idr.
Ugh. OK, well it'll take some work to wrap that around, so it's probably not urgent for nfsd. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
