On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:36:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > It's also all interrupts, not only syscalls, and also context switch if you > > want to be accurate. > > We dont need to be that accurate. Our sample rate is currently so low the > data is worthless anyway Just without checking on context switch you would lose the information of per pid system/user/total that is currently collected completely. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Martin Mares
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Karim Yaghmour
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Stephen D. Williams
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! schwidefsky
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! schwidefsky
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! schwidefsky