On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > It's not clear to me why we need this encapsulation - wouldn't it be > better to add another [pointer,size] pair to the bootloader protocol > with a structure like:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/30/68 was in response to the assumption that the initramfs is measured/appraised. These patches attempt to address those concerns. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
