Although the tty_lock() - aka legacy_mutex - protects concurrent
close/re-open of the tty->ldisc, the lock cannot be held while
waiting for the line discipline to halt. The ldisc_mutex acts as
a surrogate lock to prevent the ldisc close while waiting for halt.
Unfortunately, to reacquire the tty_lock() requires dropping the
ldisc_mutex to maintain lock order. This accounts for the complicated
sequence of:

         /* holding tty_lock() for atomic tty operation */

         mutex_lock();
         tty_unlock();
         tty_ldisc_halt();
         mutex_unlock();

         tty_lock();
         mutex_lock();

         /* check for tty state change which may have occurred
            while tty_lock() was dropped */

         /* close old ldisc & open new ldisc */

         tty_ldisc_enable();

         mutex_unlock();
         tty_unlock();

tty_ldisc_release() is exempt from locking the halt, as the only
other possible concurrent user, tty_ldisc_hangup(), checks tty
state to prevent this concurrent use.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index c2837b2..9599b05 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -505,6 +505,9 @@ static void tty_ldisc_restore(struct tty_struct *tty, 
struct tty_ldisc *old)
  *
  *     Wait for the line discipline to become idle. The discipline must
  *     have been halted for this to guarantee it remains idle.
+ *
+ *     Callers other than tty_ldisc_release() must hold ->ldisc_mutex and
+ *     cannot be holding tty_lock() (aka legacy_mutex).
  */
 static int tty_ldisc_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty, long timeout)
 {
@@ -533,6 +536,9 @@ static int tty_ldisc_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty, long 
timeout)
  *     released, which in turn, guarantees that no future buffer work
  *     can be rescheduled.
  *
+ *     Callers other than tty_ldisc_release() must hold ->ldisc_mutex and
+ *     cannot be holding tty_lock() (aka legacy_mutex).
+ *
  *     You need to do a 'flush_scheduled_work()' (outside the ldisc_mutex)
  *     in order to make sure any currently executing ldisc work is also
  *     flushed.
@@ -713,10 +719,7 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int ldisc)
 
        retval = tty_ldisc_halt(tty, o_tty, &work, &o_work, 5 * HZ);
 
-       /*
-        * Wait for hangup to complete, if pending.
-        * We must drop the mutex here in case a hangup is also in process.
-        */
+       /* Wait for hangup to complete, if pending. */
 
        mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to