On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:36 -0800, Bing Zhao wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Bing Zhao wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > > > know. > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > > > From: Avinash Patil <pat...@marvell.com> > > > > > > > > commit bbea3bc432dc5c08d09ca5c80afdd82515470688 upstream. > > > > > > This patch is not for stable kernel. > > [...] > > > > Right, I've managed to pick up 3 changes to mwifiex that it looks like I > > shouldn't have included. Firstly: > > > > 9c969d8ccb1e mwifiex: check wait_event_interruptible return value > > > > This had "3.6+" to the left of <sta...@vger.kernel.org>, whereas I > > expect version qualifiers to be on the right. So my import script just > > put this in the queue without asking me to interpret the version > > qualifier. (I don't automate *that* because people use too wide a > > variety of syntaxes.) > > Sorry. From now on I will put version qualifiers on the right side of > <stable@vger...> > > > > > When trying to apply that, I found that it seemed to depend on these > > two: > > > > bbea3bc432dc mwifiex: wakeup and stop multiple tx queues in net_device > > I'd rather classify this patch as an enhancement because the code change is > relatively large. > To play it safe, let's drop this patch from -stable. > > > b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure case correctly > > This is a bug fix indeed. > > > > > which also looked like they were important fixes. Presumably I should > > drop all of those? > > Please drop bbea3bc432dc only. > > I can resend a backport of "b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure > case correctly" for 3.2-stable.
Thanks, I've made these two changes.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
- Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
