On 02/06/2013 04:27 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Shuah Khan wrote:diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c index 67bad4b..ed78400 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ remove_pud_table(pud_t *pud_start, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, static void __meminit remove_pagetable(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool direct) { - unsigned long next; + unsigned long next = pgd_addr_end(start, end); pgd_t *pgd; pud_t *pud; bool pgd_changed = false;This isn't enough, there's a potential for an infinite loop if !pgd_present() is ever true in the iteration since "next" remains constant. Theoretical, maybe. I think it's better to just set next before checking for !pgd_present() in the iteration so it's clear what's happening.
Yes, Andrew's patch just fixed it like this. :) Thanks. :)
Or, even better, change this into the standard do-while loop that everything else uses.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
