On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 22:23 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > On 02/05/2013 08:36 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 19:30 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > > >> It's huge, so here's a link: > >> > >> http://www.candelatech.com/~greearb/debug.tgz > >> > > > > The trace shows that __netif_receive_skb() is grabbing an > > rcu_read_lock() but never releasing it. But I don't see any possible way > > that can be true in the code. > > > > Can you apply the following patch and run the trace again. I'd like to > > see if the code is going in the path I expect it is. > > I'll look at this in detail tomorrow. I have a few patches in dev.c code, > maybe > I merged something badly....
I wish you told me that in the beginning. That you modified the core code. In that case I would have asked to see your modifications before anything else. I'm 99% sure that the bug is in your modifications. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
