On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:57:35AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: >> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > >> > > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + >> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > > > >> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig >> > > > index 6979498..f9459b3 100644 >> > > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig >> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig >> > > > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ config KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE >> > > > select NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS >> > > > select INET >> > > > select EXPERIMENTAL >> > > > + select TTY >> > > > select SERIAL_8250 >> > > > select SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE >> > > > select IP_PNP >> > > >> > > There's no 'config TTY' in the kernel AFAICS. >> > > >> > >> > It's added in linux-next by 4f73bc4dd3e8 ("tty: Added a CONFIG_TTY option >> > to allow removal of TTY"). >> > >> > Adding Greg to the cc to figure out which tree this should be merged >> > through. Greg, please find the patch inline. >> >> Ideally it would go through my tree, but it can't because >> KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE isn't in my tree :( >> >> I suggest just adding it to whatever tree this change is in, >> it doesn't "hurt" to enable a config option that isn't in the >> tree at the moment, right? Or will Kconfig complain about it? > > Yeah, that's a good idea - I think Pekka can apply that change > just fine to help anyone doing merges - I don't think kconfig > treats it as a fatal error.
Applied, thanks guys! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/