> That's no problem if we make this SMP-specific - I doubt anybody actually > uses SMP on i486's even if the machines exist, as I think they all had They do. There are two (total world wide) 486 SMP users I know about and they mostly do it to be awkward ;) > special glue logic that Linux would have trouble with anyway. But the The Compaqs were custom, the non Compaq ones included several using Intel MP 1.1. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Maciej W. Rozycki
- [PATCH] 2nd try: i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
- [PATCH] 3rd try: i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
- [PATCH] 4th try: i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
- Re: [PATCH] 4th try: i386 rw_semaphores fix Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] 3rd try: i386 rw_semaphores fix Anton Blanchard
- [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores, general abstraction... David Howells
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andrew Morton