On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:00:22 -0500
Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived
> differently from the list ones. While the list ones are nice and elegant:
> 
>         list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member)
> 
> The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter:
> 
>         hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member)
> 
> Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only
> they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking
> exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate.
> 
> Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required:
> 
>  - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h
>  - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones.
>  - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this
>  was modified to use 'obj->member' instead.
>  - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator
>  properly, so those had to be fixed up manually.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
>
> ...
>
> @@ -4525,7 +4524,7 @@ int __init_or_module cgroup_load_subsys(struct 
> cgroup_subsys *ss)
>        * this is all done under the css_set_lock.
>        */
>       write_lock(&css_set_lock);
> -     hash_for_each_safe(css_set_table, i, node, tmp, cg, hlist) {
> +     hash_for_each_safe(css_set_table, i, tmp, cg, hlist) {
>               /* skip entries that we already rehashed */
>               if (cg->subsys[ss->subsys_id])
>                       continue;

Problems in cgroup_load_subsys().

In linux-next, that function is now using the `node' storage which your
patch removes:

@@ -4503,23 +4525,17 @@ int __init_or_module cgroup_load_subsys(struct 
cgroup_subsys *ss)
         * this is all done under the css_set_lock.
         */
        write_lock(&css_set_lock);
-       for (i = 0; i < CSS_SET_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
-               struct css_set *cg;
-               struct hlist_node *node, *tmp;
-               struct hlist_head *bucket = &css_set_table[i], *new_bucket;
-
-               hlist_for_each_entry_safe(cg, node, tmp, bucket, hlist) {
-                       /* skip entries that we already rehashed */
-                       if (cg->subsys[ss->subsys_id])
-                               continue;
-                       /* remove existing entry */
-                       hlist_del(&cg->hlist);
-                       /* set new value */
-                       cg->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = css;
-                       /* recompute hash and restore entry */
-                       new_bucket = css_set_hash(cg->subsys);
-                       hlist_add_head(&cg->hlist, new_bucket);
-               }
+       hash_for_each_safe(css_set_table, i, node, tmp, cg, hlist) {
+               /* skip entries that we already rehashed */
+               if (cg->subsys[ss->subsys_id])
+                       continue;
+               /* remove existing entry */
+               hash_del(&cg->hlist);
+               /* set new value */
+               cg->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = css;
+               /* recompute hash and restore entry */
+               key = css_set_hash(cg->subsys);
+               hash_add(css_set_table, node, key);     <<<<---- here
        }
        write_unlock(&css_set_lock);
 


This didn't show up (apart from a "used unintialized" warning) because
your patch forgot to remove the definition of `node'.

I did this.  Tejun, could you please opine?


@@ -4456,7 +4455,7 @@ int __init_or_module cgroup_load_subsys(
 {
        struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
        int i, ret;
-       struct hlist_node *node, *tmp;
+       struct hlist_node *tmp;
        struct css_set *cg;
        unsigned long key;
 
@@ -4534,7 +4533,7 @@ int __init_or_module cgroup_load_subsys(
                cg->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = css;
                /* recompute hash and restore entry */
                key = css_set_hash(cg->subsys);
-               hash_add(css_set_table, node, key);
+               hash_add(css_set_table, &cg->hlist, key);
        }
        write_unlock(&css_set_lock);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to