On the lines of macro: lock_policy_rwsem, we can create another macro for
unlock_policy_rwsem. Lets do it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 795b0e8..c46aed4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpufreq_policy_cpu);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rw_semaphore, cpu_policy_rwsem);
#define lock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static int lock_policy_rwsem_##mode \
-(int cpu) \
+static int lock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
{ \
int policy_cpu = per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, cpu); \
BUG_ON(policy_cpu == -1); \
@@ -81,23 +80,18 @@ static int lock_policy_rwsem_##mode
\
}
lock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-
lock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-static void unlock_policy_rwsem_read(int cpu)
-{
- int policy_cpu = per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, cpu);
- BUG_ON(policy_cpu == -1);
- up_read(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy_cpu));
-}
-
-static void unlock_policy_rwsem_write(int cpu)
-{
- int policy_cpu = per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, cpu);
- BUG_ON(policy_cpu == -1);
- up_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy_cpu));
+#define unlock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
+static void unlock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu)
\
+{ \
+ int policy_cpu = per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, cpu); \
+ BUG_ON(policy_cpu == -1); \
+ up_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy_cpu)); \
}
+unlock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
+unlock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
/* internal prototypes */
static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
