Il 08/02/2013 05:05, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
>> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>>
>> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
>>
>> 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
>> provided as an array of struct scatterlist.
>>
>> Because of these limitations, virtio-scsi has to copy each request into
>> a scatterlist internal to the driver. It cannot just use the one that
>> was prepared by the upper SCSI layers.
>
> Hi Paulo,
>
> Note that you've defined your problem in terms of your solution
> here. For clarity:
Good catch. :)
> The problem: we want to prepend and append to a scatterlist. We can't
> append, because the chained scatterlist implementation requires
> an element to be appended to join two scatterlists together.
>
> The solution: fix scatterlists by introducing struct sg_ring:
> struct sg_ring {
> struct list_head ring;
> unsigned int nents;
> unsigned int orig_nents; /* do we want to replace sg_table? */
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> };
>
> The workaround: make virtio accept multiple scatterlists for a single
> buffer.
>
> There's nothing wrong with your workaround, but if other subsystems have
> the same problem we do, perhaps we should consider a broader solution?
Do they? Given the resistance you have had on the topic, perhaps they
don't (though I agree that chained scatterlist are horrible).
But I'll add a note on this to the commit message and why the workaround
is IMHO acceptable.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
