On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Hillf Danton <dhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com> wrote:
>> + if (waiter->type != RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
>> + list_del(&waiter->list);
>> +
>> + /* Set RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS before waking the last
>> reader
>> + * so we know there will be a remaining active
>> locker.
>> + */
>> + if (!(--readers) && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
>> + rwsem_atomic_add(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
>> +
>> + tsk = waiter->task;
>> + smp_mb();
>
> For what with mb?
This is the same mb that used to be before the readers_only label
before this change.
The intention is that the write to waiter->task must be the last
access to waiter - after that, the reader is granted the lock so it
could do anything, including deallocating the waiter structure as it
gets out of rwsem_down_read_failed() and possibly deallocating the
task structure if it exits
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
