3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Phil Sutter <phil.sut...@viprinet.com>

[ Upstream commit 9665d5d62487e8e7b1f546c00e11107155384b9a ]

When releasing a packet socket, the routine packet_set_ring() is reused
to free rings instead of allocating them. But when calling it for the
first time, it fills req->tp_block_nr with the value of rb->pg_vec_len
which in the second invocation makes it bail out since req->tp_block_nr
is greater zero but req->tp_block_size is zero.

This patch solves the problem by passing a zeroed auto-variable to
packet_set_ring() upon each invocation from packet_release().

As far as I can tell, this issue exists even since 69e3c75 (net: TX_RING
and packet mmap), i.e. the original inclusion of TX ring support into
af_packet, but applies only to sockets with both RX and TX ring
allocated, which is probably why this was unnoticed all the time.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil.sut...@viprinet.com>
Cc: Johann Baudy <johann.ba...@gnu-log.net>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dbork...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dbork...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1349,13 +1349,15 @@ static int packet_release(struct socket
 
        packet_flush_mclist(sk);
 
-       memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
-
-       if (po->rx_ring.pg_vec)
+       if (po->rx_ring.pg_vec) {
+               memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
                packet_set_ring(sk, &req, 1, 0);
+       }
 
-       if (po->tx_ring.pg_vec)
+       if (po->tx_ring.pg_vec) {
+               memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
                packet_set_ring(sk, &req, 1, 1);
+       }
 
        synchronize_net();
        /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to