On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:46:20PM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:33 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > > On 02/13/2013 04:35 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 12:35 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > >> 3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > > >> know. > > > > > > > > FWIW, I never saw this on 3.7 but it happened 1st time on 3.8-rcX > > > > I haven't tested this fix either. > > > > > > Dito. > > > > > > Gr. AvS > > Yeah, I don't believe anything could trigger it in 3.7. It doesn't hurt > > anyway. > > Client locking splat is definitely triggerable on 3.7: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/251 > > Subdev locking splat is triggerable since 3.7 has "drm/nouveau: add locking s/is/should be/
> around instobj list operations" and "drm/nvc0/fb: fix crash when different > mutex is used to protect same list" (both applied for 3.7.3). > > Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
